Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
Additionally, Congress has overcome significant gridlock to unite in opportune moments, particularly in reauthorizing and recalibrating FDA-related legislation such as the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
In Carpenter, Petitioner ACLU argues that the “degree of invasiveness of the surveillance” involved distinguishes this case from prior precedent holding there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in records held by third-parties such as banks or phone companies.[18] The government, respondent, argues inter alia that changes in technology are not relevant, because a reasonable expectation of privacy cannot attach to 3rd party business records created by that 3rd party… [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
In less than two decades, the Supreme Court did away with standing requirements in most petitions against the government, holding that every petitioner has the right to demand that the government follow the law. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
McLean County Unit Dist. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
McLean County Unit Dist. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
Supreme Court activity has limited the ability of overseas plaintiffs to bring securities class action claims within the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The rather, ahem, dry argument takes an interesting turn when the chief justice asks a hypothetical question about the “wild horses, or wild burros, whatever they are,” of the Western states that wander across state lines, and whether a state could “exercise dominion” over them. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
They must further demonstrate that this investment will benefit the United States economy and create the requisite number of full-time jobs for qualified persons within the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
What the Rephrased Questions Mean Ordinarily, when the Supreme Court grants a petition for review, it accepts the petitioner’s framing of the issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
What the Rephrased Questions Mean Ordinarily, when the Supreme Court grants a petition for review, it accepts the petitioner’s framing of the issue. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Second, the revised scope of jurisdiction under the MCA 2009 extneds commission eligibility to persons who were part of al Qaeda or the Taliban and those who "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, a case that would have answered the question of whether emergency room doctors in Idaho can perform abortions as health stabilizing measures. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:11 pm
Only two species of newt occur in the eastern United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
The Snyders are supported by a number of Veteran's organizations, by 48 states and the District of Columbia, and by a bipartisan group of nearly half the United States Senate. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
