Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am
In the United States, Nokia won a preliminary ruling at the ITC over two patents, and the result could be a U.S. import ban against HTC's Android-based devices. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
InterDigital Commc’ns v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:15 pm
A close look on this definition demonstrates that this concept has two dimensions. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm
United States’ Argument Ed Kneedler argued for the United States here, and the argument was a delight for law professors like me. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:36 am
But see United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Consider it a replay of that old Hume v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
United States (here), the Supreme Court recognized a presumption of reliance on an omission of material fact by a party with a duty to disclosure that information. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller and Wellons did not purchase an investment unit. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 10:19 am
The style of the case is, Cardenas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:14 pm
The petition of the day is: Turner v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
The United States suggests that the ADA preempts the implied covenant claim when it is a separate cause of action, but not when it is simply an element of argument on a pure contract claim. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 12:34 pm
The case, DC Comics v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
Also, it found that this measure was “necessary in a democratic society” as it was manifestly illegal to publish the photos, and because courts in two European States had found them to be illegal. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
United States) which discusses the practice. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:43 am
United States of America, et al., U.S.D.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
