Search for: "A R C C A Inc" Results 8461 - 8480 of 8,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees cited the California Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Economic Opportunity Atlanta, Inc., the Eleventh Circuit has regularly reaffirmed the “reasonably prudent” person standard in ADEA cases. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 3:29 pm by Karyn K. Ablin
They represent composers, authors, and publishers (the “C,” “A,” and “P” in ASCAP’s name) in licensing public performances of songs. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
As for financing, Dow had $9 billion from PIC, $4 billion from Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and the Kuwait Investment Authority, and a $13 billion bridge loan (available to be drawn upon if the ROH merger closed before K-Dow closed even though Dow’s position publicly was that the ROH merger was not contingent upon the closing of K-Dow). [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Under §11(c)(7) of the new LLC Act, the grounds for dissolution in §48(a)(4) and (5) cannot be varied by the operating agreement. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
Today, the Federal Securities Law Blog takes a look back at the last 30 days in the federal securities world in a regular feature which appears on approximately the 15th of each month. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs consolidated complaint arguing (1) that the plaintiff ADS investors lacked standing to represent purchasers of Eletrobras bonds; (2) that the plaintiffs had failed to adequately allege material misrepresentations with respect to defendants’ statements about (a) ethics and integrity, (b) Eletrobras’s  financial condition, and (c) scienter; (3) that the plaintiffs failed to adequately allege scheme liability, because they… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Minor, [915 S.W.2d 437 (Tenn. 1996)]; see also [Restatement (Second) of Torts § 436 cmt. c (1965)]. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
Canada The Michael Geist blog has an article criticising the Government’s defence of the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11). [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
Trial Rule 15(C), the amended complaint then would relate back to the date of the original complaint. [read post]