Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 8461 - 8480 of 21,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
More recently, in Ferdinand v MGN Limited [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) Nicol J said that a substantial body of the public would consider that the England football captain fell within Buxton LJ’s list of “those from whom higher standards were expected”. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
So he throws the captain's body overboard and tells the crew to set a course for China or he'll do to them what he did to his harassers, plus he'll (allegedly) scuttle the ship. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:20 pm
  Well, I could reason from first principles, but we also have cases on the issue, and since those are binding on us, we'd best start there.On the one hand, we have an en banc Ninth Circuit case from 1993, which held -- as Judge Farris describes it -- "that the Eighth Amendment prohibited clothed body searches of female prisoners by male guards directed by a prison policy to 'push inward and upward when searching the crotch and upper thighs of the inmate,'… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 3:25 am by Kathleen Morrison, Brodies LLP
The appellant’s employer believed that the continued employment of experts involved in the high-profile McKie case would be damaging to the new body’s reputation. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
In addition to creating a 4.5 centimeter-deep tumor in his penis, the cancer had metastasized to his lymph nodes and throughout his body. [read post]
Part IV Chapter II Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULCRA”) as amended by The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2587) (the “1995 Regulations”) TULCRA as originally enacted by Parliament went beyond the requirements of European law under Council Directive 77/187/EEC (now under Council Directive 98/59/EEC) in extending a right to be consulted prior to redundancies to… [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by John W. Arden
Thus, the court held that the Board of Health exceeded its authority under Boreali v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm by Jon Sands
  The FPD in Arizona represents the petitioner in this capital habeas appeal.]Mann v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:26 am
 The Federal circuit ruled that a claim directed to a method of detecting human body temperature was valid and did not relate to patent ineligible subject matter. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]