Search for: "Brown v. Brown" Results 8461 - 8480 of 12,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 So whatever the other details are in the Brown case, a copyright claim against the former adviser from one of his co-authors is unlikely to be successful. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm by Brianna Rauenzahn
The Justice Department cited the Supreme Court’s reasoning in FDA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by admin
    Born 1985, died 2011   Lastly, I spent two posts heralding what I hope will be the most interesting Supreme Court case since Kelo v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 9:12 am by Ben Sheffner
And due to a series of rulings over the past few months, the case appears to be on its last legs.The case, Andersen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Queensland Labour MP Don Brown has settled a defamation action by agreeing to a court order that he pay $50,000 in damages to a former LNP candidate over defamatory comments he made about her. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
The opinion testimony of the medical director improperly intruded upon the function of the jury to determine whether to credit the victim's statements (see People v Eberle, 265 AD2d 881, 882)...With respect to the contention of defendant that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct, we agree with defendant that the prosecutor improperly appealed to the jurors' sympathies in his opening statement (see People v Brown, 26 AD3d 392, 393). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  He can go over the top a lot of times, especially in dissent, but then there’s this footnote to the decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Justice Jackson noted it in his classic separate opinion in Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The public needs to be able to assess whether paying out around £500,000 per year to Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and John Major is a sensible use of its tax revenue at a time of austerity – and, indeed, whether the very existence of a non-statutory expense account for retired politicians is a good idea. [read post]