Search for: "C. M." Results 8461 - 8480 of 35,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 9:15 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Diese Erkenntnis wurde kürzlich mit EuGH-Urteil C-310/17 im Zusammenhang mit dem holländischen Streichkäse «Heksenkaas» bestätigt. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 1:54 pm by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
 Cuando surgieron las empresas de tercerización o más conocidas por su nombre en inglés de Outsourcing, no faltaron quienes como yo gritamos “sacrilegio” al observar cómo los derechos laborales: reparto de utilidades, antigüedad de empresa y otros, pasaron a un tercer o cuarto plano frente a las necesidades laborales del nuevo mundo: menor pago de impuestos, horarios flexibles, la no subordinación y mucho más. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:27 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes M&A Contracts: Purposes, Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice, and Allocating Risk Through Contract: Evidence from M&A and Policy Implications (discussed on the Forum here), both by John C. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:11 am by JR Chaves
No confió en su célebre oratoria para defenderse de las acusaciones de Pompeyo y optó por sobornar los testigos. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
U.S. (1951) Frankfurter stressed that “[c]ourts are not representative bodies. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 12:23 pm by José Guillermo
es IMPOSIBLE que no haya ninguna mención a los hechos, es más , DEBE DARSE CUENTA de ¿Cómo encontraron el cuerpo de García? [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
It is essentiаl thаt tаxpаyers request а review of their cаse from аn IRS mаnаger. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 02407 (3d Dept., 2019), following a nonjury trial Supreme Court granted the wife a judgment of divorce and concluded that the husband was solely responsible for a student loan C then roughly $ 224,000 C related to the college education of the middle child. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
” Thus, can be avoided, the expense and time required by: (1) the opponent’s having to prepare and present arguments justifying a court order for access to the system that produced the evidence; (2) overcoming the objections of the owner/operator of the technology as to: (a) violations of the confidentiality of business information, including that of thousands of customers, clients, or patients; (b) protecting intellectual property privacy; and, (c) the expense and time lost due… [read post]