Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 8461 - 8480 of 12,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
However, it does emphasise the importance of use of the mark beyond actual (or estimated) percentage use in the grand scheme of the business, such that Wenman had nonetheless demonstrated that she had accrued the necessary goodwill.In EU case law, a similar standard has been upheld. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:09 am
I hope the DEA and Department of Justice at some point explain their embrace of Headley/Gilani -- especially after his testimony failed to result in the conviction of the charged defendant. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In such situations, the SPAC may raise additional funds through a private placement of SPAC securities. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
The Newman defendants are (1) President Bush; (2) an Indian legal services firm, Acumen Legal Services (India) Pvt., Ltd.; (3) the Indian services firm's U.S. affiliate, Acumen Solutions, LLC; and (4) John and Jane Doe defendants. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Aguirre, 15-374, involves a criminal defendant who, partway through an interview with police decided, “I can’t give everything away,” and asked to stop the questioning so he could take his current girlfriend’s child to the child’s grandparents (and, he said, later return to resume the interview). [read post]
”[23] Regulating defendant’s publication stricter than other newspapers and magazines was not only unfair in this case, but unconstitutional.[24] Similarly, in Hoffman v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
The opinion does not reveal whether the appellant argued double-dipping much less does it address the issue through the lens of appraisal methodology or doctrine. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm by Roy Black
” But OP says he does not believe he is doing that. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am by Nathaniel Sobel
This post unpacks briefings from the defense, the government and Google (through an amicus brief) on the motion to suppress in that case, U.S. v. [read post]