Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 8461 - 8480 of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you don’t do it, there might be consequences v. you must do it. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Corporations and the Uses of Law: International Investment Arbitration as a 'Multilateral Legal Order' Peter Muchlinski Abstract:      This paper seeks to examine the claim, made by certain legal scholars, that international investment law, though based mainly on Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) is in fact a multilateral order that introduces principles of an emergent “global administrative law” into the regulation of state conduct in relation to foreign investors and their… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Childhood sexual abuse reported by sex offenders Research has revealed a wide variation in the estimated incidence of childhood sexual abuse among offenders (Hanson & Slater, 1988; Hindman & Peters, 2001; Schwartz, 1995). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
This morning’s BBC’s NewsHour show opened with a news judgment reflecting a genuinely odd moral calculus. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:32 am by Kara OBrien
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Naturally, she sued the railroad.The issue in Palsgraf v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by George Lenard
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
As the case against May & Tucker buckled, the advocate depute contacted the then Lord Advocate, Lord Peter Fraser, now Ministerial Complaints adviser to Alex Salmond, who concurred the case should be dropped, even though it was by then clear to many onlookers, there was a gay Scottish judges connection with Thailand’s gay boy industry. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
There’s one notable exception: NBC will not air the debate in order to air Sunday Night Football (New York Giants v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Below the Second Amendment, interest quickly peters out until you reach the Tenth. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]