Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 8461 - 8480 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
Thomas, on the issue of unconstitutionally excessive statutory damages, a petition for certiorari has been filed with the United States Supreme Court.The petition maintains that a statutory damages award which is 44 times the actual damages is unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Apparently missed filing deadlines are so common (see the addenda below) that the Supreme Court took up the matter during this term, and issued an unfavorable opinion for those missing the deadline for filing monetary claims against the United States (in this instance, a property loss claim). [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Apparently missed filing deadlines are so common (see the addenda below) that the Supreme Court took up the matter during this term, and issued an unfavorable opinion for those missing the deadline for filing  monetary claims against the United States (in this instance, a property loss claim). [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Patricia Millett will argue United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-11612), asking whether a criminal defendant must himself waive the right to appear before an Article III judge. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:31 pm
§ 4106A(b)(1)(A) and the Treaty Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on the Execution of Penal Sentences, U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 4:59 am
The evidence supported "a conclusion that respondent's use was made solely to block petitioner's planned expansion into the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:12 pm
Seferin Ceraj and his wife, Irini Deda-Ceraj, both natives and citizens of Albania, entered the United States using fraudulent documents in March of 1997. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
Appellant-respondent State of Indiana appeals from the post-conviction court's order granting appellee-petitioner Michael A. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
""In sum, we conclude that plaintiffs have shown by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) that plaintiffs acted independently and in good faith to develop the NITRO marks and products; (2) that MHR manufactured the NITRO products for plaintiffs; (3) that plaintiffs acted as foreign manufacturer and defendant as U.S. distributor for the sale of the NITRO products in the United States; (4) that plaintiffs are the owners of the NITRO marks in the United… [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 12:19 pm
The judge rejected his asylum petition because it was filed more than a year after his arrival in the United States. [read post]