Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 8461 - 8480 of 16,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States, a challenge to the federal sex offender law. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:45 am by Yishai Schwartz
” In Guantanamo news, Wells provided daily coverage of motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
Scheindlin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has expanded upon her well-known Zubulake V opinion (229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)), setting forth crucial guidance for all parties to litigation as to their obligations to preserve and collect all potentially relevant records – whether paper or electronic – once litigation is reasonably anticipated, and providing an important example of the extremely serious… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant before acquiring cell-site-location information from wireless carriers, that “question the factual and legal assumptions of the pro-Carpenter briefs. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Rubinstein's article analyzing the Vinluan decision has been published in Northwestern University's Law Review [103 Northwestern Law Review Colloquy 317 (2009)].In an article entitled A Lawyer's Worst Nightmare: The Story of a Lawyer and His Nurse Clients Who Were Both Criminally Charged because the Nurses Resigned En Mass, Professor Rubinstein explores the events leading to a troubling situation, the result of which led to litigation wherein New York… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It is only in very recent cases that courts in New York and California have recognized state law performance rights. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak talks to the baker and the same-sex couple whose dispute over the baker’s refusal to create a cake to celebrate the couple’s wedding constitutes “another battle in the culture wars,” culminating in a high-profile Supreme Court case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In  Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:35 am
In this case, a State Supreme Court judge decided the doctrine prevented Sheila Pisano from pursuing this lawsuit against the New York City Board of Education. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It pointed out that Service without New York State may be made in the same manner as service is made within the state (see Domestic Relations Law § 75–g[1][a]; CPLR 313). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the foregoing, David Goldstein commenced an action against the respondent, on or about December 20, 2006, entitled Goldstein v Gold, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, under Index No. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 He also argued that the suspension by the Library constitutes a violation of his rights under the United States and New York Constitutions including due process and equal protection.In constructing her ruling, the Commissioner of Education Elia said that “Education Law §310 states in part that the Commissioner is 'authorized and required to examine and decide' a petition 'made in consequence of any action ... [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Andy Dorchak
Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Ruling Allows Strip Search for Any Arrest New York Times (April 2, 2012). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
District Court for the Southern District of New York, comes from Alison Frankel at Reuters. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:26 am
Telling Miller's Tale (with Brannon Denning): A look at the 1939 case of United States v. [read post]