Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 8481 - 8500 of 12,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by John Elwood
And I would be willing to bet that the Justice Department lawyers tasked with defending those programs will find themselves quoting the joint dissent with approval. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am by Peter Mahler
 The Manhattan Commercial Division’s decision last month in Mascarenhas v Paam Group Inc. involves  an Indian restaurant named Nirvana on Lexington Avenue around the corner from my Manhattan office that, as far as I knew, has been shut down for some time due to the drastic impact of the COVID pandemic on retail and hospitality businesses in the midtown office district. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
The derivative action as far as I know is authorized by statute and/or common law in every state. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
As Orin does an excellent job addressing the opinion, there’s no need for me to recap as I have nothing worthwhile to add. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 10:41 am by Schachtman
It pains me that the Respondents (plaintiffs) generally did a better job in explaining significance testing than did the Petitioner (defendant). [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:12 am by Patricia Hughes
I checked out the actual Licence Appeal Tribunal (Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario) (“the Tribunal”) decision in Akbar Zarehhossainabadi, Kingsway Real Estate Ince. and Rouhollah Houshmand v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:55 am by Susan Brenner
As I’ve explained in other posts, U.S. defendants charged with crimes have the constitutional right to have the charged tried before a jury of their peers. [read post]