Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 8481 - 8500 of 30,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 11:58 am
Scotusblog recently ran a piece by Andrew Hamm titled Looking back at predictions in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 8:15 am
Last year, the Indiana Court of Appeals noted, in the case of Hickory Creek at Connersville v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm
., states that the new rule "remove[s] unnecessary barriers to the fair and expeditious resolution of representation questions. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Furthermore, said the court, the evidence showed that notwithstanding Teacher's prior unblemished record of service, she continued to blame others and refused to accept responsibility for her failure to effectively manage her classroom and deliver effective instruction and was unwilling to implement any of the school administration's suggestions for improvement.The Appellate Division held that under the circumstances the penalty of termination “does not shock one's sense of… [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 1:41 pm
United States is a touchstone. 'The ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas,' he wrote. 'The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.' The corrupt information that dominates the private square does not rise to the top of a free and fair competition of ideas. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:09 am
[Thanks to Kelly V for her clear and concise explanation]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The court held that "the fact that everyone else is doing it is not a particularly compelling justification" for the fair use doctrine under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
  In response, the JFTC have stated that they have amended the relevant parts so that the injunctive relief would be considered illegal only under certain circumstances and that they would review each situation on a case-by-case basis, determining whether there is exclusionary conduct or a substantial restraint of competition. [read post]