Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 9,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
The Super League v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
The Chamber and Business Roundtable originally planned to challenge Rule 14a-11 on grounds that the SEC lacked authority to adopt it, per the earlier decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
This might not meet the standard, but a trial court in New York, in Crocker C. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Only one South Carolina case discusses this issue, Widman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm
In the United States, the President awards the National Medal of Freedom. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Employer v employee Theft of IP and other sensitive information from companies is very common. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
C.M., 2012 ABPC 139 (paras. 49-53); Siemens Canada Limited v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
C.M., 2012 ABPC 139 (paras. 49-53); Siemens Canada Limited v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
More specifically, the focus is on the risk of complicity in the human rights violations of others (principally states but also other actors (insurgents, agents, That, in turn, can be understood to involve three distinct areas of human rights risks: (1) conflict zone risks; (2) states that may be directly or indirectly involved in the commission of human rights wrongs or in support of states committing these wrongs; and (3) states, other… [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm
We want to see efficiency gains. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Finally, are there broader insights to be gained from this situation? [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am
” The truth is, though, that you can’t have a nanny state without having a police state. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:01 am
In addition, the EDPB states that informed consent pursuant to Chapter V of the CTR “responds to core ethical requirements of research projects deriving from the Helsinki Declaration and is primarily a measure to ensure the protection of the right to human dignity and the right to integrity of individuals under Article 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; it is not conceived as an instrument for data protection compliance. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
And in more amicus brief news, IJ is asking an Indiana state trial court put a stop to a troubling new trend: the state—acting through a private prosecutor—conducting civil forfeitures in virtual secrecy by redacting basic information (including the names of the defendants, descriptions of the property being forfeited, and nearly all of the probable-cause affidavit required by state law) on court documents. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:25 am
See Zafarana v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
