Search for: "State v. David."
Results 8481 - 8500
of 14,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
The concept of "victims' rights" was just then broadening its impact upon the criminal justice system, fueled by a United States Supreme Court decision styled Payne v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:58 am
Goliath Litigation Recommendations for David v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
The Court emphasized the high level of deference that federal habeas courts must show to state-court decisions on the merits, particularly state-court decisions rejecting Jackson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
Phelps Notes David McAloon, Davis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The solicitor for Paul Chambers, David Allen Green, writes about the case in “The Lawyer”. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
Balto Many opponents of Google’s business practices have trotted out the United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
David Vaver explains this issue very well in his discussion of “Taking a Particle Does Not Infringe” at p. 184-188 of his 2011 book. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 7:17 am
Ruff v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm
(David Kopel) McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:25 pm
(David Kopel) My article yesterday for Scotusblog discussed the tremendous importance of the Court’s 7-2 use of the non-coercion rule to limit Spending Clause violations of State sovereignty and independence. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
The Roberts opinion joins McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:38 am
And: While Furman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:33 am
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:32 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; David E. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:29 am
Spreeman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:28 am
THE STATE OF WYOMINGJUSTIN LINDALE FITCH v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Olson, Appellate Counsel; David E. [read post]
