Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 37,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 10:51 am
Norsworthy will not have the state pay for her reassignment surgery. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
A plaintiff must establish (1) an injury in fact (2) fairly traceable to the challenged conduct (3) that is likely to be `redressed by a favorable judicial decision. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:06 pm
The class action case, Frliken et. al. v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:36 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to dismiss a claim for sexual orientation discrimination under Title VII in Philpott v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
I should say, with the exception of the Taylor case and perhaps your Shamsid-Deen appeal, I'm quite sympathetic to most of the arguments you presented in the cases I examined.1) For instance, the argument you expressed in State v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am
Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:03 am
While the precise language had not yet been interpreted under Maryland or Texas law (the latter being the jurisdiction whose law applied to the insurance contract), other jurisdictions had, in favor of enforcing the exception, and the Court agreed.Kemper had also argued against enforcing the exclusion on public policy grounds. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:34 am
When Saks filed amended returns, the taxing authorities ("the County") agreed to and did pay the requested refund amounts, but Saks' claim for interest.Saks filed suit, and the trial court dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:40 pm
The Court stated that a claimant may recover for lost profit if the loss is reasonably foreseeable and can be proven with reasonable certainty. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
State, supra (quoting Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am
In Ohio, as in many, if not all, states, the state Supreme Court is in charge of disciplining attorneys who violate the state’s rules of professional conduct. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:00 am
Stobart v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:16 am
Conrad argues in favor of preemption. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
In every case, the Justices ruled in favor of the religious plaintiff. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See Getting v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm
by Michael Risch The Federal Circuit’s upcoming consideration of Ariad v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm
by Michael Risch The Federal Circuit's upcoming consideration of Ariad v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm
In the United States Eastern District Federal Court Decision of Baynes v. [read post]
