Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 am
Indeed, Adam Thierer and I wrote a lengthy paper about What Unites Advocates of Speech Controls & Privacy Regulation? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
The Respondent’s base of operations is the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:13 am
Congress has stated that encouraging independent living for people with disabilities is the policy of the United States government. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am
The common thread running throughout the essays in this book was the turn to law of each of these four groups: the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Protestants and Other Americans United for the Separation of Church and State (POAU), the Nation of Islam, the Concerned Women for America (CWA) and the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry (RCFM). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:11 am
The United States Trustee (UST) Program assisted the FTC in its efforts. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:12 am
Frontline (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) No extensions allowed – California District Court finds that non-functional use of file extension may be trade marked: Autodesk, Inc. v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm
Marks v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
Frontline (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) No extensions allowed – California District Court finds that non-functional use of file extension may be trade marked: Autodesk, Inc. v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Stevens is the last of them, and his departure will mark a cultural milestone. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
In early 2003, the United States Postal Inspection Service began a fraud investigation of Phillips. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:20 am
Feld Entertainment, Inc. was heard in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
United States. [read post]
