Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 68,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2010, 11:08 pm
Louis overturned a 2008 district court ruling that had blocked almost all of the suits from being sent back to state court in Minnesota and dismissed most of the lawsuits that were being heard in Little Rock. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:46 am
On 9 November 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Harpur Trust v Brazel. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
Logan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Download CRT v Barr. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
., Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am
There are several requirements that must be satisfied in determining a fee is reasonableness as stated in Rule 1.5(a), Rules of Professional Conduct (emphasis added); See State, Dept. of Transp. and Development v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Does 1-7, has been dropped, without any subpoenas or ex parte discovery order having been granted.This makes the third such case of which we are aware, the other two being Arista v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:19 pm
The two exceptions to the Mississippi employment-at-will doctrine identified by the state supreme court in McArn v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 10:13 am
The court, at best gratuitously or at worst goading the state legislature to correct the law being interpreted, in dicta said, Washington County’s Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan are much less thorough than the PSC public review and approval process regarding the construction of generating stations. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
United States, 319 U.S. 190, 216 (1943); Yakus v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Plaintiff, held as a federal prisoner in a state prison, was subject to a separation order from the United States Marshal's Service requiring him to be separated from three other federal inmates being held at the same facility. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:13 am
Robinson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:04 pm
I recently read a paper by a colleague discussing the lawsuits currently being pursued by various states against the new health care rules. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am
Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
