Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 8501 - 8520 of 11,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
In September 1998, under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), Amazon filed a patent application for its ‘1-click’ ordering system (application no 94779/98) and claimed priority on the basis of earlier applications filed in the US in September 1997 and March 1998. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
Cooper Indus., LLC, No. 2010-1227, 2011 WL 553603, at *2 (Fed. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this case may be difficult in the current political context: for example, the politics of Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:50 am by admin
Cooper v Cooper 2011 NY Slip Op 03989 Decided on May 10, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed in all respects the supreme court holdings in the parties’ divorce. it was a provident exercise of discretion for the lower court to deny wife’s motion for preclusion based on obstructive behavior during discovery. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cooper Indus., LLC, No. 2010-1227, 2011 WL 553603, at *2 (Fed. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Malaysia. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:41 am by Neomi Rao
 For example, in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:00 am by EEM
(The Conversation, May 2011) [text]Regional Cooperation and the Malaysian Solution (Inside Story, May 2011) [text]Regional Processing or Trading Refugees? [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
The examiner rejected claims 1 and 20 as obvious in view of Patent Cooperation Treaty Publication No. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:28 pm
Canada has worked cooperatively with the United States to ensure North American security is protected. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:30 am
  That was the lesson an excess-layer D&O carrier learned when it attempted to assert insured-versus-insured and fraud exclusions to defeat a claim to policy proceeds by the purchaser of a corporation in Wojtunik v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am by PJ Blount
The Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Addington v. [read post]