Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 8501 - 8520 of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
Murphy, supra, 552 F.3d at p. 412 [citing Edwards in holding that “once [the defendant’s] cell phone was held for evidence, other officers and investigators were entitled to conduct a further review of its contents ... without seeking a warrant”]; United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:45 am
Gill, 513 F.3d 836, 844 (8th Cir. 2008) (weighing in favor of reasonable suspicion the fact that defendants had prior arrests for drugs and weapons but "[n]either of the defendants answered questions about their criminal records forthrightly"). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:27 pm by A. Benjamin Spencer
AC Hydraulic A/S, 383 F.3d 546, 550 (7th Cir.2004) (“[A]lthough technological advances may alter the analysis of personal jurisdiction, those advances may not eviscerate the constitutional limits on a state's power to exercise jurisdiction over nonresident defendants. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The court rendered the decision even though the in-house lawyer worked for the company’s parent corporation rather than the defendant company itself. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The court rendered the decision even though the in-house lawyer worked for the company’s parent corporation rather than the defendant company itself. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Shortly after the victim came out of his house and  told the woman to leave, the defendant approached the victim with a gun and said, “Don’t f**kin’ move. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:08 am
Koerth, 312 F.3d 862, 868 (7th Cir. 2002) (“If a defendant is successful in establishing the invalidity of the search warrant, the burden then shifts to the Government to establish that the police relied in good faith on the judge's decision to accept the affidavit and issue the warrant. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:01 am by Diego Zambrano
Must U.S. courts give foreign dictators easy access to our courts as plaintiffs and protections when they are defendants? [read post]