Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 8501 - 8520 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Despite this fact, the Third Circuit noted that, “[f]requently,” discovery in collective actions “focuses on the named plaintiffs and a subset of the collective group,” a limitation that may hinder defendants’ ability to present individualized defenses that may not be applicable to all opt-in plaintiffs. [read post]
  Despite this fact, the Third Circuit noted that, “[f]requently,” discovery in collective actions “focuses on the named plaintiffs and a subset of the collective group,” a limitation that may hinder defendants’ ability to present individualized defenses that may not be applicable to all opt-in plaintiffs. [read post]
  Despite this fact, the Third Circuit noted that, “[f]requently,” discovery in collective actions “focuses on the named plaintiffs and a subset of the collective group,” a limitation that may hinder defendants’ ability to present individualized defenses that may not be applicable to all opt-in plaintiffs. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:11 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” The Court pointed out, though, that “[i]f a conspiracy is proven, each conspirator is liable for his or her co-conspirators’ wrongful acts and for the damages resulting to the plaintiff. [read post]
1 May 2017, 2:08 pm by David Kramer
Construction Aggregates Corp. , 570 F.2d 626, 629 (6th Cir. 1978). [read post]
1 May 2017, 2:47 am
Andreas Føllesdal (Univ. of Oslo - Law) has posted Towards a More Just WTO: Which Justice, Whose Interpretation? [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 12 April 2017 the Court of Appeal granted the defendant’s application for permission to appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
ITC, 661 F.3d 1322 (Fed Cir. 2011) (in the context of ITC injunctions against imported products made using misappropriated trade secrets) that federal courts have open-ended authority to create a federal common law of trade secrets, rather than applying the UTSA or the law of any specific state. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:40 am by Tom Kosakowski
Concurrent Session 3 (Chair: Anna Cybulko)National and Local Ombudsman Offices in Austria: Similarities and Differences in their Activities and Responsibilities -- Nathalie PoddaStudent Ombudsman as Mechanism for Protecting Student Rights in Macedonia -- Aleksandra ZhivkovikjHow the Consumer Protection Act has been Applied in a Canadian Higher Education Institution -- Nora FarrellConcurrent Session 4 (Chair: Jean Grier) Students‘ Rights and Duties: Who Defends them Better: Student… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:12 pm by Frank J. Dürring
Rule 4(f)(3) Even when nations have expressly agreed on a means of service, Rule 4(f)(3) provides that a defendant may be served „by other means not prohibited by international agreement, as the court orders. [read post]