Search for: "Does 1 - 20"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 28,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
After BDG refused, Hussey filed a suit alleging copyright infringement on March 20, 2020. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 3:04 pm
1. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:58 pm
” Correction Law § 168–d(1)(a)(emphasis supplied). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 3:50 pm
The Court has addressed possible Tenth Amendment violations in its December 20, 2007 decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:08 pm
Overall, the InfoSoc Directive does not differentiate between the taking of a work as a whole or in part for the sake of applying Article 2, so the concept of reproduction ‘in part’ should not be intended in a quantitative sense. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
Although that Rule does not allow general solicitation or advertising, it is not limited to accredited investors only (up to 35 sophisticated purchasers can participate) and the issuer does not have to take “reasonable” steps to ensure the accredited status of its investors. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 3:04 pm
1. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
See § 20(b)(1)(B), 125 Stat. at 333–34 (effective Sept. 16, 2012). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:35 am
Around the weblogs 1. [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:46 pm
A will dated September 20, 2006 has been offered for probate by the nominated executor. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
It does. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:07 am
Dec. 20, 2018)“This is an unfair trade practices action between two fierce competitors in the residential and multi-family home siding market. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:42 am
Based on how Article 17(2) is formulated, the authorization that OCSSPs are required to seek from concerned rightholders shall encompass at least the activities described in Article 17(1) – that is the storage (this being inherent to the notion of OCSSP) and communication to the public of works and/or making available to the public of protected subject-matter. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
Thus, the questions before us are: (1) is the prominent portion of a varietal name barred from registration under Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, and 45 because varietal names are the equivalent of generic designations; (2) if so, does the record show that IFG is a prominent portion of the varietal names of record for the identified goods; and (3) does this constitute an absolute bar to registration given Applicant’s prior valid and subsisting trademark… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
This does require that the goods were manufactured under the control of a single body, and that there was a possibility of control over the quality of the goods. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
So does this mean its a mandate? [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
(relisted after the March 20 conference) King v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 7:17 am
Yes it does. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:53 pm
The current version of G.S. 20-139.1 refers to DHHS rules but does not specifically authorize their promulgation. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 4:00 pm
District Court Judge William Acker just may have dropped a 20-pound bar of Kryptonite down Superman's red shorts. [read post]
