Search for: "People v Johns"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
As social creatures, they are subject to the same pushes and pulls of social psychology that explain most people. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
Session 3: Licensing IModerator: Yonathan ArbelJonathan M. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
She is on all kinds of boards, all kinds of journals, she is one of those people who really think to the future, and always think of the problems ahead. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control: "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
On trade secrecy and privacy issues implicated by people using large language models like ChatGPT, I found Dave Levine's essay and this HJOLT note by Amy Winograd really helpful. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
” Prakash uses the term broadly to include any form of interpretation that allows for “informal constitutional change” outside the Article V amendment process (see pp. 112-13, 130). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm
Those objections are based on both Bannon’s role as a political strategist and because his personal worldview and recent actions alarm many people across the ideological spectrum on national security grounds. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
” (emphasis added)We do not know what proportion of initial leads are false positives, casting suspicion on blameless people. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
District Judge John Gleeson in Brooklyn is a defeat for HSBC and the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
Chief Justice Back in the 'Stoneridge' Case
Legal Times
The Supreme Court announced Thursday that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has re-entered the closely watched case of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
” II So why, exactly, would the lawyers in the Office of the Solicitor General, the very last people who would make tactical litigation mistakes before the Supreme Court, take three such seemingly unorthodox steps in presenting such important cases to the court? [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
During nearly two hours of oral argument in Yellen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm
At the end of the argument in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
Supreme Court held in Illinois Brick v. [read post]
