Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 8501 - 8520 of 23,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
Mr Justice Gerard Hogan, who delivered the Court of Appeal judgmentWhat (if any) steps may a court require internet service providers (ISPs) to take to assist copyright holders to identify customers who use the network provided by these providers to access the internet for the purpose of illegally downloading or uploading copyright material? [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Full Federal Court took this question on after an appeal from the Federal Court whose decision was handed down in late 2015.The case of Scandinavian Tobacco Group Eersel BV v Trojan Trading Company Pty Ltd dealt with the sale of tobacco products in Australia, specifically cigars manufactured by STG Eersel. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
A state passes a law that says “no citizen may sell Widgets anywhere in this state”. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 9:38 am by John Jascob
These contentions, however, were incorrect: no regulation requires an FCM to record phone instructions to cancel previously authorized orders to buy or sell. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm by Ron Coleman
 In this lawsuit, as it happens, AT&T was taking the position that the two customer loyalty programs were not competitive: One was for credit card customers, and one was for whatever it is AT&T sells these days — oh, right — “finance and telecommunications”? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But their interests may not be aligned with consumers’; no movie has ever had less than 3 stars on Fandango, and Yelp sells its services to businesses rather than to consumers. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Different question about length v. breadth while in place. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Congress enacted this remedy because it recognized that “it is the design that sells the article” and, because profits attributable to design are often “not apportionable,” “[i]t is expedient that the infringer’s entire profit on the article should be recoverable, as otherwise none of his profit can be recovered. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:40 pm by Michael Grossman
This absence of information can be construed as negligence on the part of the company selling the dangerous drug. [read post]