Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 37,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am
Court of Appeals in New York City affirmed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Apple, finding that the IONEX mark was weak, the parties sold very different products to very different customers, and that there was no evidence of bad faith or of actual confusion in the (Saxon Glass Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
Hedge Fund Adviser’s Cert Petition Cites Federal-State Conflicts on Fiduciary Duty, Seller Liability
15 Sep 2015, 3:01 am
The adviser argued that those holdings created conflicts between state and federal laws regarding the fiduciary duty owed to investors in hedge funds and regarding the imposition of seller liability (Ellrich v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
A corporation is domiciled only in the state where it is incorporated (Sease v Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York, 306 NY 284 [1954]). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:50 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
Plaintiff maintains that this Court must follow SZ Medical P.C. v State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The officer stated as he arrested the protesters that he was arresting them for violation of the tent ordinance. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:04 am
The trial court found in favor of the employer, and the parties were compelled to arbitrate. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
We remember Marbury v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:10 am
Sherman v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:52 am
That case is Wilson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
Dukes, Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
If true, its a major deviation from a consensus view that has developed in the cases and scholarly commentary in favor of the error-cost approach. [read post]
