Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8501 - 8520 of 19,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by INFORRM
In his conclusion, Lord Leggatt pointed out the vastly different approaches taken by Mr Justice Warby in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal where Mr Justice Warby is now sitting. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final… [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
Even worse, if a defendant is found not guilty in state court — meaning she is legally innocent — federal prosecutors can still prosecute. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
Circuit decisions in the Guantánamo habeas cases have largely sided with the government on its legal authority to detain under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, the most relevant Supreme Court case—Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:37 pm by Tony Kakooza
Following in the heels of Al Hajji Nasser Sebagala versus MTN, H.C.C.S No. 283 of 2012 (see here) and Agaitano versus Uganda Baati, H.C.C.S No. 298 of 2012 (see here), the High Court has come out in Asiege v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court decisions in history, Professor McDonald undertakes the "unenviable task" of defending the Court's 1896 decision in the case of Plessy v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:56 pm by Erin Miller
Chief Justice Roberts has still dissented in only one argued case decided on the merits this Term (South Carolina v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:55 am by Jared Staver
DUI Victims’ Rights in Illinois Under the Illinois Crime Victims’ Rights Constitutional Amendment, detailed in Section 8.1 of the Illinois Constitution, victims of certain crimes, which includes DUI’s, have the following rights under Illinois law: (i) to be notified in a timely manner of all court proceedings involving the DUI in which they were injured; (ii) communicate with the prosecution; (ii) be heard at any post-arraignment court proceeding in which the… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am by Orin Kerr
It is clear from the cases that the officer’s order still makes the emptying of the pockets a search. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:11 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued one of the most anticipated decisions of this term, Ricci v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:04 am by CMS
There is perhaps still doubt as to what is required to pass the threshold. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The ordeal culminated in a sweeping Supreme Court ruling penned by Justice Louis Brandeis that set the stage for the Miranda warning many years later. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
 On May 17, 1954, Chief Justice Warren read aloud to a packed and hushed courtroom every word of his opinion in a case called Brown v. [read post]