Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 8521 - 8540 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 8:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): ORDER MOTION OF DEFENDANTS KELLY, GEORGE, SMITH, SOLOMON, JOHNSON, CANETE, GEORGE, ROMERO, EDWARDS, AND ARMSTRONG TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO F. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The court rendered the decision even though the in-house lawyer worked for the company’s parent corporation rather than the defendant company itself. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  The court rendered the decision even though the in-house lawyer worked for the company’s parent corporation rather than the defendant company itself. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:13 pm by Shea Denning
Fields, 315 N.C. 191, 199 (1985) (stating that “[i]f the defendant has brought the weapon along, he has at least a psychological use for it: it may bolster his confidence, steel his nerve, allay fears of his apprehension,” and explaining that even when the weapon is never physically employed, “it functions as a backup, an inanimate accomplice that can cover for the defendant if he is interrupted”). [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am by Jenna Ard
Clemco Industries, Inc., 391 F.3d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 2004).) [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am by Attorney Articles
Clemco Industries, Inc., 391 F.3d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 2004).) [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:58 am by China Law Blog
Guajardo, at the end of his piece, asked Mexicans to “defend our interests, clarify the lies [and] promote the truth. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm by Adam Doerr
The rationale for this approach is that an order granting class certification is often dispositive because defendants face enormous pressure to settle. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Corp. v. a2z Mobile Office Sols., Inc., 326 F.3d 687, 695 (6th Cir. 2003). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit: In re Grand Jury Matter #3, 847 F.3d 157 (2017). [read post]
Co., 694 F.3d 935 (8th Cir.2012), where the Eighth Circuit rejected the argument a removing defendant must submit proof of the class size or amount of damages per class member where such information was readily obtainable by the corporate defendant. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 10:37 pm by Jon Katz
At sentencing, most criminal defendants will be more concerned about minimizing their incarceration time than obtaining access to the Internet. [read post]