Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 12,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
This morning, I read an excellent law-review article (no, not entirely an oxymoron) from Erin Murphy at NYU titled "Databases, Doctrine, and Constitutional Criminal Procedure," found via CrimProf Blog, related to a subject that comes up now and again on Grits: The way databases and their usually unintentional inaccuracies can create constitutional liberty violations for which the US Supreme Court in Herring v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:44 pm
As discussed further below, this can pose a challenge for companies of all types advertising through affiliate marketing programs.In the FTC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
"Marbury v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
The CGL policies were issued from February 22, 2002 through July 18, 2005, while the umbrella policies were issued from April 21, 2004 through July 18, 2006. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
So I want to be sure that you’re telling us that the attorney general and the Department of Justice do recognize the authority of the federal courts through unelected judges to strike acts of Congress or portions thereof in appropriate cases.Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:20 am
Represented by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), the plaintiffs in Gill et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
" After Kaervsang cited Marbury v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
Plaintiff Steven Simkin (husband) and defendant Laura Blank (wife) married in 1973 and had two children. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
Simmons (2005), in which the court categorically prohibited the death penalty for defendants who committed their crimes before the age of 18; and Graham v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
I think it does. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
In the case rent control’s defenders cite selectively, Yee v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:39 am
In Gresser v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
Instead, I’d like to expand on our thinking on three key issues. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
CLEVENS, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
In other words, coercing someone to give you a password through the implied threat of termination of their employment if they refuse does not give you authorized access to a website. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
According to Townsend v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Marine Polymer v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
Now, in case you have never considered the job description for members of the Board of Trustees at a college or university… you can be sure there’s some fund raising involved… not let’s hold a raffle fund raising… I’m talking BIG TIME fundraising… the kind of fundraising one does by calling on alums who have made it to the top. [read post]
