Search for: "Doe I " Results 8521 - 8540 of 259,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
If the perpetrator of the crime does not have extensive assets, there may be nothing to sue for, however, in some cases, a person’s insurance may help pay expenses relating to a civil lawsuit. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 12:57 pm
When a restaurant knows there is a danger of burns and does not take action to prevent them, this is when a personal injury lawsuit may be most likely to succeed. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 8:38 am
To prevent this situation from unfolding, Wisconsin State law does not permit either parent to relocate more than 100 miles away from their place of residence at the time of agreeing to joint custody. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:38 am
Furthermore, if a hotel does not carefully screen its staff’s criminal backgrounds, it may hire someone unfit to be trusted with personal property, which could result in employees who steal from hotel patrons. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:33 am
If the assault happened while you were working, it does not matter whether the assailant was someone you work with or a third party. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:18 pm
Even if the responsible party does not have much money, their home or auto insurance companies may be a source of compensation. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 9:47 am
Hiring an attorney does not mean that you intend to take your case to trial or make the situation any more contentious than it already is. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
Many people who purposely or accidentally shoplift small items are not exactly dangerous criminals, and while that is not an excuse for taking something that does not belong to you, you may rightfully feel as though it would be unfair for you to bear the full brunt of the criminal justice system. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
For example, in KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), Arnold J accepted that a confidentiality agreement between one of the priority applicants and the patentee containing a clause stating “I hereby assign and agree to assign…” was sufficient to transfer equitable title to the patentee and that this was sufficient to render the patentee the “successor in title” for the purposes of Article 4A of the Patent Convention (as transposed into the Patents… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:38 am by Ryan Scoville
As the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel explained in 2007, a position “‘summoned into existence only for specific temporary purposes’” does not qualify as an “office” in the modern constitutional sense. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 4:43 am
" As stated in the Consultation form, this means that rights only need to be cleared for the "country of origin" of the broadcast and not also for the country/ies of reception, ie the countries where the signals are received [surprisingly enough, there are no decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the interpretation of Article 1(2)]. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:26 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The broader, unacknowledged problem, however, is the potential effect of the expansion on international law as a whole, as I discuss in detail here. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:45 am by Jeff Sovern
Ok, so she didn't actually say anything about consumer protection, but an article in the Times from September 9 (I'm behind in my reading), Some of Sarah Palin's Ideas Cross the Political Divide, has some unexpected (at least to me) statements from Palin that argue for protecting people against big business. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:05 pm by The Greatest American Lawyer
In this CNN.com article covering the White House Correspondence Dinner, the author notes Seth Meyers' hilarious metaphor about the way congress passes legislation by comparing it to the how we all simply say “I Agree” anytime the button pops up in our face on the Internet, more specifically, the iTunes terms. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 10:36 am by Eric Turkewitz
OK, not exactly the gold of Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities opener, but I needed something to compare the recent fiasco of Justice Brett Kanvanaugh‘s confirmation hearing with the removal of Queens Civil Court Judge Terrence O’Connor today. [read post]