Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 16,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm
Massachusetts had a policy requiring a small pox vaccination during an outbreak. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Carter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:26 am
” See Pom v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:36 am
Plaintiffs (and their advocates in academia) do not like the current state of the merits inquiry. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
In a 1985 case, Winston v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
Supreme Court case, specifically, Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
But we have now narrowed down the controversy to a small subset of the police powers of state governments: is the regulation of private morality within or outside the legitimate police power of states — and how are we to decide this question? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:37 am
However, two months later in State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
Ps were predominantly small firms, a bit over 64%, 72% of Ds were also small firms. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:24 am
This cannot be laid at the door of the Secretary of State. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
Akhverdiev v Azerbaijan 29/1/15 On 8/10/05 Mr A acquired ownership of a property in Baku, Azerbaijan. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Small p is good, and the standard rule of thumb is that a result with a p over 0.05 is not "statistically significant. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:08 pm
That is, instead of applying to a small number of specific if unidentified (at least by name) individuals, it potentially applied to a much larger class of individuals, anyone falling within the description. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
Nickel v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Renna v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Lots of businesses in the real world have very small differences in their names; they can register a corporate name w/a small difference in the state corporate registry. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
The final point at issue seems a rather small one. [read post]
