Search for: "True v True"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 33,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm
BP v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
It was the Court of Appeal decision in McKennitt v Ash [ 2008] QB 73 , comprising of Buxton LJ, Longmore LJ ( pictured) and Latham LJ, which first set out clearly the false privacy principles namely; The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private not whether it is true or false. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
, 1982 SC (HL) 114, Furniss v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am
Tribal lending under CFPB enforcement: Tribal sovereign immunity and the “true lender” distinction. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 12:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
It is overinclusive in proscribing speech that is not a true threat. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
It's true, for example, that probation often comes with the conditions that Judge Kleinfeld discusses. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
I get that in the old days, we might not have wanted posthumous child support filings because we'd want the father to be able to defend himself, and say (if true) that he wasn't the parent, which is hard when you're dead. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:31 am
True enough. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:59 pm
A conclusion that should make the founders of this Special Day proud.It'd be one thing if Judge Kleinfeld were to say: "I'm sure this was not the intent of those who created the Sentencing Guidelines [totally true], but due to the crazy wording of the underlying statute, which was designed for an entirely different reason [statute of limitations], we've got no choice but to ignore this intent and apply the literal words of the guideline and enhance the sentence. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
There are certain things are are indisputably true. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
We're going to declare -- despite the fact that we know it's not true -- that the amount of alcohol in 2100 parts of breath by volume is equal to the amount of alcohol in 1 milliliter of blood.When you do that, by definition, you know you're convicting "innocent" people -- people who do not, in fact, have a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
But the Court of Appeal reads the statute and says that's not true; that there's a more general intent requirement.And I understand where that concept comes from. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:03 pm
article may well be equally good -- or, in many cases, even a fair piece better -- as an identical one from a year ago.That's particularly true here. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
., where you recover fees if successful), if you're a defendant in a SLAPP case, you've got an incentive to file your anti-SLAPP motion and make all the applicable (and true) arguments as to why plaintiff's lawsuit will and should be dismissed. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
(In truth, you can tell from the footnotes that Judge Kozinski's not entirely sure that's right, but he concedes -- at least for purposes of argument -- that's perhaps true; he instead holds that it's irrelevant. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 10:28 pm
So too here.And that's true equally with both prospective and current clients. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
But if that's true, then abolishing the Griffin rule is probably harmless. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:45 am
Is there anything going on with those employees that might be the true cause of the request to fire Jim? [read post]
