Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 1:30 pm
Everyone who works in the United States deserves basic labor rights if they get hurt on the job. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
In California, contract principles determine who has standing—the eligibility to make a claim or sue an insurer—to recover benefits due under the policy or for a “bad faith” withholding of policy benefits, as stated in Seretti v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
” Hacked Off has an article covering the Independent Press Recognition Panel’s sixth Annual State of Recognition Report, which was highly critical of the industry-controlled press complaints handler, IPSO. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
(relisted after the Apr. 22 Conference; likely relisted after Apr. 29 Conference) Apparent new relist United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:45 am
The dissenting opinion relied in part on Mediaone of Greater Florida, Inc., 340 NLRB 277 (2003) and Community Hospitals of Central California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:42 pm
The dissenting opinion relied in part on Mediaone of Greater Florida, Inc., 340 NLRB 277 (2003) and Community Hospitals of Central California v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:54 am
Trust in (young) women of color to lead, innovate in post-Roe world In some ways — like income inequality and the cost of child care — the United States is in a worse situation than when Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Boundas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
In its holding, the Court of Appeal was careful to distinguish the California Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:46 am
Legal Standard to Establish Unlawful Discrimination The amended regulations also update the legal standard to establish unlawful discrimination to conform with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Servs. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
