Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm
Bechtold, Bechtold Law Firm, PLLC, Missoula, MT) (Dan Kaplan is an Assistant Federal Public Defender in Phoenix, Arizona) [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Carpenter, 819 F.3d 880, 886 (U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 504 F. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
LeCompte, 780 F.2d at 1264. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:50 pm
Defendant’s daughter called 911 and operators could hear defendant yelling, “She was f–cking cheating on me, she was cheating on me for one year” in the background. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:31 pm
., — F.4th — (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
Temple Univ., 869 F. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Schuchat, 510 F.2d 731, 734 n.3 (D.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:07 pm
” A seaman was injured while serving aboard the F/V Mary Belle. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
Coca-Cola Co., 678 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012), a case that we have commented on (here, for example) at least as many times as we have enjoyed the fine beverages manufactured by either Pom Wonderful or the Coca-Cola Company. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Defendant had ample substantive challenges as well. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:06 pm
Yousef, 327 F.3d 56, 111 (2d Cir.2003) This nexus requirement "ensures that a United States court will assert jurisdiction only over a defendant who should reasonably anticipate being haled into court in this country. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
Defendants. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
Defendants. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:28 am
In September 2016, by consent, Defendant was appointed a GAL who had full access to all information regarding Defendant’s “situation” but permitted Defendant to revoke the appointment at any time. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:46 am
Feiner, 694 F. 3d 208 (2d Cir. 2012) (discussed here) eliminated the requirement that plaintiffs provide evidence of a similarly situated comparator if defendants inappropriately employed SEQRA. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
G.S. 15A-302(f). [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 9:08 am
[MAN 1]: The autopsy, the f*** autopsy! [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:11 am
Brown, 558 U.S. 120 (2010): [I]f a juror is told the probability a member of the general population would share the same DNA is 1 in 10,000 (random match probability), and he takes that to mean there is only a 1 in 10,000 chance that someone other than the defendant is the source of the DNA found at the crime scene (source probability), then he has succumbed to the prosecutor’s fallacy. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
G.S. 15A-302(f). [read post]
