Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 8541 - 8560 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 4:43 am
Ken Feinberg will NOT be "more generous than any court" From the beginning of his involvement in the claims process, Feinberg's message has been consistent: utilize the claims process rather than litigation, because he would be more generous than any court. [read post]
Does the Commission’s Assessment that Skolfield Abdicated Law Enforcement Responsibility Amount to Scapegoating? [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 12:26 am by JR Chaves
Primero rechaza el camino seguido por el Juzgado y la Sala contencioso-administrativo del Tribunal Superior de Justicia, quien consideraba que ante una infracción de derecho comunitario y por su efecto útil, y principio de primacía, la administración debía reconocer directamente el derecho arrebatado a las víctimas del acto ilegal. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:39 am by centerforartlaw
”[18] Ultimately, the Florida case was dismissed in 2021, and the Superior Court of Justice of Mexico City ruled in favor of FKC, allowing Mattel to sell Frida Barbies across stores in both countries.[19] The outcome of these cases reaffirmed FKC’s legal control over Frida’s image, despite her family members’ desires. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:39 am by centerforartlaw
”[18] Ultimately, the Florida case was dismissed in 2021, and the Superior Court of Justice of Mexico City ruled in favor of FKC, allowing Mattel to sell Frida Barbies across stores in both countries.[19] The outcome of these cases reaffirmed FKC’s legal control over Frida’s image, despite her family members’ desires. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
TINA specifically prohibits a contractor from claiming the Government’s price would not have decreased because the procurement was sole source or the contractor otherwise had superior bargaining power.[16] A contractor also cannot claim the Contracting Officer should have known the data were defective even though the contractor took no affirmative action to inform the Contracting Officer the data were defective.[17] A contractor cannot claim the price would not change because the… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by steven perkins
Further, as explained in Article 46, the Declaration does not imply any right to take any action that would dismember or impair, totally or in part, the territorial integrity or political unity of sovereign and independent States. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Superior Court, CA Supreme Court Addresses Work Privilege Product for Witness Statements – http://bit.ly/Ld4evC (Scott Leviant) Is Social Media Discoverable? [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
REV. 991 (2018); U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-12 Excerpt: Parts I, II, IV and V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In theory it’s recursive—policing might have effects on what the public thinks—but courts look at what the TM owner does as if intent mattered. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:50 am
The policy encourages officers to tell members of the public when they are being recorded, but does not require officers to obtain consent before activating the cameras. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]