Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 178,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm
Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, however, did not address whether the employers in that case owed a duty of care or whether plaintiffs could demonstrate that either of them contracted COVID-19 because of any negligence in the defendant’s workplace. [read post]
Helping Neighbor with Livestock Not Included in Iowa’s Domesticated Animal Activity Liability Shield
6 Jul 2023, 3:19 pm
Plaintiff sued defendant and defendant’s associated businesses for negligence. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm
Fuchsberg Touro Law Center Tarpon Towers II, LLC, and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (collectively “Plaintiff’s”) applied for a special use permit (the “Application”) to permit the construction of a cellphone tower in Sylvania, Ohio (the “City”) which the Sylvania City Council (“Defendants”) then denied. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 10:37 am
In Oklahoma you generally must file a response with the court clerk within twenty days after the plaintiff serves you with a summons. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
However, what if the plaintiff actively licensed its content for a fee? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am
Substantive due process relates to circumstances in which the plaintiff has been deprived of "life, liberty, or property without due process. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
Now, defendants are going to have an additional opportunity to immediately challenge the lower court’s approval of a plaintiff’s expert witness. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:49 am
Certain Underwriters a Lloyd’s, 465 F. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
Courtroom View Network is excited to launch our annual ‘Summer Special’ discount offer, which allows even more affordable access to the world’s only video library of civil jury trials featuring the top plaintiff and defense attorneys in the country in action in front of real juries in real courtrooms. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:05 am
Dep’t of the Army (D.D.C.) -- awarding plaintiff costs and $111,415 in attorney’s fees—after reducing plaintiff’s fee request for time spent on unsuccessful issues—in case concerning access to Army’s mental-fitness questionnaire and related records. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:28 am
The court sided with the plaintiffs, issuing a broad injunction that does not clearly track First Amendment standards. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
Thus, it was the plaintiff’s counsel’s conduct that caused the defendants’ prejudice, and therefore it was plaintiff’s counsel that was responsible for paying the reasonable fees and expenses for the reopening of discovery. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
Thus, it was the plaintiff’s counsel’s conduct that caused the defendants’ prejudice, and therefore it was plaintiff’s counsel that was responsible for paying the reasonable fees and expenses for the reopening of discovery. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
Thus, it was the plaintiff’s counsel’s conduct that caused the defendants’ prejudice, and therefore it was plaintiff’s counsel that was responsible for paying the reasonable fees and expenses for the reopening of discovery. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:13 am
That's the question in Doe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Here is a LINK to an article that was published on Law.com on June 30, 2023 outlining a Georgia trial court's vacation of a $1.5 million dollar jury verdict in favor of a personal injury plaintiff due to the plaintiff's attorney's social media posts.Makes for an interesting read of a cautionary and expensive tale. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
Therefore there was antitrust injury with the result that the plaintiff lacked standing. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In dismissing the complaint, the court found that the plaintiff failed to plead facts supporting a reasonable inference that the statements were false or misleading. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
Indeed, as Butler J commented in granting discovery at an earlier stage in Mr Carey’s own case, it “is difficult to draw exact parallels between the law of privacy in this jurisdiction and the law in the neighbouring jurisdiction especially in light of the constitutional aspects of the plaintiff’s claim in these proceedings …” (Carey v Independent News & Media plc [2021] IEHC 229 (26 March 2021)). [read post]
