Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 8541 - 8560
of 9,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a court can award to a party who prevails in an action against the United States the “fees and other expenses…incurred by” that party if the position of the United States was not “substantially justified. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:28 pm
Two cases, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear: the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:44 am
Lundin, United States Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Tennessee The Honorable Cecelia G. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:08 am
United States [...] [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
Justice Robert H. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
Precisely because Brown has become the crown jewel of the United States Reports, every constitutional theory must claim Brown for itself. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 10:12 pm
I. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
United States, the Court asked the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in the context of United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:50 am
And looked to United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Hall, ed., Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (New York: Oxford Univ. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
In other news relating to Citizens United, Jeff Rosen suggests in The New Republic that the decision was “precisely the kind of divisive and unnecessarily sweeping opinion that Chief Justice John Roberts had once pledged to avoid. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:47 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 pm
United States, a truly landmark case, argued and won by Damon Key attorneys Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:15 am
Scharf KMJ41.H87 N49 2008 (Lobby Display) Find this book in ThomCat More about this title from Amazon.com Environmental Regulation: Law, Science, and Policy Robert V. [read post]
