Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 33,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2017, 2:45 pm
” This is the fourth published opinion in this case I’m aware of. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 2:45 pm
” This is the fourth published opinion in this case I’m aware of. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
And, regardless, it’s an interesting data point. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:31 pm
Straus, Specialist on the Congress; Christina M. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 12:05 am
Typically, a plaintiff is trying to find an acceptable resolution of a traumatic event, according to Rene M. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
Read the judgment for the full (extremely poor) handling of Ms M’s application by Enfield. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Paez, rejected the government’s uncabined construction of one INA provision, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), which gives the President power to bar the entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:58 am
I'm defending them against the power of the state. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:31 am
The study was reported by Utah’s Daily Herald, and makes for very interesting reading. [read post]
4 May 2022, 11:21 am
I’m not racially diverse, or otherwise so. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm
CPE Working Paper No. 2012-7; Penn State Law Research Paper No. 15-2012). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:10 am
And if this is sufficient cause to overcome the Petite Policy’s limits against dual prosecution, no state pardon of an unpopular defendant, a hated crime or tainted pardon (I’m looking at you, Crazy Joe) is safe from the jeopardy of going from state court “bad” to federal court “worse. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:28 pm
” It has licensing guidelines for student groups (and other groups) that want to use the marks: The guidelines state that designs using ISU marks “must … appropriately portray the image of Iowa State University,” that an ISU “[m]ark cannot be incorporated into or dominated by the marks of others,” and that “[n]o products considered dangerous or offensive will be approved, including but not limited to products … promoting… [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
In today’s technical correction, the SBA states that populated joint ventures have been eliminated. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 5:11 pm
A (lone, thus far) comment to Grit’s post raises another interesting question: Would you snitch on a fellow attorney? [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:58 am
Justice Anthony M. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
According to the State, if A Montanan wants to have any privacy interest in hs or her communication, it must be made in person or over the telephone. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 4:07 pm
I’m not convinced these new provisions will really “modernise” defamation law. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:30 am
I’m interested in when the law has treated working class people as actors in their own right and supported that capacity to act, as objects of state indifference that employers are allowed to treat however they life, and as objects of state concern to be protected from economic predation. [read post]
