Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 23,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2015, 4:59 pm
Second, the government sells the expropriated raisins for somewhat less than full market value and spends the money. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:05 am
" If you face charges simple possession, with no intent to sell, you may be eligible for deferred prosecution. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
Inc. of consumer fraud (Danika Gisvold v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 6:51 am
See Munoz v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Justice Scalia wishes the court had expressed no opinion about expressing no opinion
5 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
The case is Wednesday’s Rosemond v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:24 am
The Third Circuit gave employers new reasons to worry about misclassifying their employees in its decision in Figueroa v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:23 am
Illinois Tamale Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
County Sheriff Marty V. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:49 pm
On Friday October 3, 2013, Governor Brown signed into law AB 1412, which provides full relief for individuals affected by the decision in Cutler v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:41 am
Ali v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 1:56 pm
Apple operates dozens of retail stores in California that display and sell Apple products, and its store managers are instructed to conduct the searches of all employees whenever they exit the store for any reason, including rest and meal breaks and the end of the employee’s shift. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
Mustafa v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 5:10 am
This post is a follow-up to my post a couple weeks ago regarding the Zenimax v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:14 am
(R. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Nothing…except that when I was getting a new set of tires put on my car, I had time to read Murr v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
I don't pretend to be an expert on the California Environmental Quality Act -- 1700-page treatises are devoted to CEQA's nuances -- but I know enough to realize that the California Supreme Court's decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:07 am
The trial court in US v Fahnbulleh (D.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:23 am
Parker-Hannifin Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:54 pm
See Transcript, Jones v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:33 am
In Webb v Special Electric Company, Inc., the Supreme Court unanimously adopted the sophisticated intermediary doctrine in California, and then split 5-2 on how it should be applied. [read post]
