Search for: "UNITED STATES ARMY"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 8,663
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2007, 1:18 am
John Shadegg and Peter Hoekstra (PDF 354 KB) Letter discusses how Republicans should debate HCR 63, Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq 02/13/2007
Audit: Controls over the Army, General Fund, Fund Balance With Treasury Journal Voucher Adjustments (PDF 1.95 MB) Audit prepared by the Department of Defense's Office of the Inspector General … [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:49 am
R. 34: To establish a pilot program in certain United States district courts to encourage enhancement of expertise in patent cases among district judges. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:45 am
That is, as we all know, cybercrime can be committed state-to-state in the United States, say, or across two or more different countries.This is significant because jurisdiction has historically been based on someone's physical presence in a particular sovereign entity (nation-state or, in a federal system like the U.S. in a constituent state of a nation-state). [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:07 pm
" Governor James Rhodes declared martial law and dispatched units of the National Guard to the Kent State campus. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:15 am
Hamilton again is clear: in Federalist 74, Hamilton wrote: THE President of the United States is to be "commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE of the United States.'' . . . [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 6:05 pm
Sibley was in the US Army at the time of the patent, and one would think that inventing an improvement in a tent might be deemed in the scope of his employment. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:26 am
Telling Miller's Tale (with Brannon Denning): A look at the 1939 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 4:53 am
Article II, Section 2 gives the president these war-making powers: The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States.The Founders were wary of an executive leader who, like the King they rebelled against, could wage wars of choice. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:05 am
This idea is designed to head off the tendency in many countries that begin as democracies for the military increasingly to dominate civilian authority, eventually, in the limiting case, leading to overt military disobedience of civilian authority and military coups.The Framers distrusted the idea of standing armies and feared the degeneration of democracies into dictatorships, a distrust that is evidenced in several features of the Constitution-- the requirement that army… [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:41 pm
The first is Gutierrez, No. 06-5005/AR, a case in which The Judge Advocate General of the Army certified the rather unhelpfully worded issue of "Whether the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals erred in holding that the trial defense counsel did not affirmatively waive an affirmative defense instruction with respect to a lesser-included offense. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 3:14 pm
And they have been doing so since armies first marched and navies sailed. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 1:48 pm
President When Abraham Lincoln took actions based on military considerations, he gave himself the proper title, "commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 10:21 am
Bair, a former Army captain and helicopter pilot, has forgotten what it means to serve the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:27 am
Corey Clagett update: Local soldier gets dealStill, Clagett's supporters continue to believe in his innocence and a theory that military officials are protecting higher-ranking officers.JAG Hunter here: News flash for correspondent Mostafavi: In this country, the United States of America, and under our Constitution, people ARE INNOCENT until a jury pronounces guilt. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:04 pm
Under the National Space Policy released in October 2006, in which "Freedom of action in space is as important to the United States as air power and sea power," the U.S. [read post]
