Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 10,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
Second, awarding patents to those who are “first to file” (FTF) instead of “first to invent” (FTI) harmonizes the United States patent system with patent systems commonly used in most other countries, creating greater certainty about patent ownership in the United States which will ultimately lead to reduced need for costly litigation. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, recently reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Clinton then appealed to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Many States, businesses, and nonprofit organizations challenged OSHA’s rule in Courts of Appeals across the country. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
But the United States Supreme Court rejected his claim. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
In a string of cases, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the traditional border search exception doctrine. [23] The Ninth Circuit entered new legal territory in its landmark case United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:58 pm
" This mode of enforcement has been enacted by the entity entrusted with responsibility to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment; it proceeds through the ordinary course of prosecution by the executive, trial by a court, decision by a jury, and appeal to appellate courts, with due process at every step. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/64466-1.con.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit revived Nigerian families’ damage claims for billions of dollars against Pfizer for allegedly secretly testing a new drug in a Nigerian hospital during a 1996 meningitis outbreak. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
The court found that the Second and Ninth Circuits had permitted such recoveries where a predicate act of infringement had occured in the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
(collectively, “CLS”) by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia holding that certain claims of Alice’s U.S. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
” In 1974, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded that § 1981 extends to protect non-citizens from private alienage discrimination.[6] Thirteen years later, the Fifth Circuit reversed course with a seven-to-six vote and dismissed a non-citizen’s claim for private discrimination by finding that § 1981 only protects non-citizens from state action, and not from private… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit rejected his argument that the agency fee violated his rights under the First Amendment, explaining that it did not have the power to overrule Abood. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:50 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in a case on August 27, 2010, that dealt with a exemplary damages and insurance policies. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:10 am
The Committee described the inquiry this way: More specifically, your inquiry states that an appellate judge in your circuit is in the process of completing a book on the institution of the Staff Attorney’s Office in the federal courts of appeal. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
(collectively, “Shasta”) appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiffs LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. and LifeScan, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors, and not of the Attorney-General's department or the Australian Government] The decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum is remarkable for a number a reasons. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Previously, the 9th Circuit had sought to determine whether the state court's passing on a habeas issue was "clear error" the Himes standard is more deferential to the state court. [read post]
