Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 11:22 am
The United States Supreme Court, in cases such as Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:16 pm
At that point, according to the Harvard professor, “the United States had no Article III injury to present” in court. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
United States (293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Strong, currently a Fellow of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2012-13 term, is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and Senior Fellow at the award-winning Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, having previously taught law at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm
Samsung can bring this request again in the United States, but the California-based court doesn't want to interfere with the Japanese court. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
On March 4, 2009, in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
The Flores court correctly noted that, “since Fisher, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Concepcion has altered the legal landscape substantially. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
California. [read post]
