Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 9,831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 10:28 pm
Brandeis took this position in his dissent in Gilbert v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
The best legal talent money can buy. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:17 pm
Without proof of such allegations, I would think any prosecution for fraud in this country would violate the First Amendment under an old case, United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
However, a majority of the United States Supreme Court did not buy it, and in late 2008, issued its opinion in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
In addition, the Kleins' attempt to buy out Ambar's shares "at a severely discounted price ($125.00 rather than $8,335.00 per share) supports his claim of mistreatment by the majority shareholders and states a ground for involuntary judicial dissolution. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
The parties disputed whether this case should be evaluated under Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
no one ever got fired for buying Microsoft?! [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
In 1997, Mr Paulic applied to exercise the Croatian version of the Right to Buy and the Croatian state cross-applied for possession of the flat. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
Brentwood Borough Council v Ball & Ors [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB) This was the hearing of an application for an injunction by Brentwood BC. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
iStock_000003572051Medium.jpg In drug conspiracy and distribution bench trial, confidential informant's testimony about trying to make a controlled buy with the defendant was admissible other act evidence even if the incident occurred years after the charged drug offense when the evidence was used to prove the defendant's identity, in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
" Dennis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
As Regretsy states, “if you like something you see here, don’t argue with us, go and buy it…We’re only too glad to have made the introduction. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:04 pm
Chief Justice Roberts published a dissent from denial of certiorari today in a Fourth Amendment case, Virginia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
The problem being that in getting the warrant, the LAPD pitched the facility as just being a regular old place where you can buy pot, and didn't tell the judge any of the facts the LAPD knew that suggested that the place was providing weed legally under the Compassionate Use Act. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Hecker's supposed attempt to buy a multi-million dollar home: Others besides Mr. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:18 am
The Defendant in this case was a licensed purveyor of alcohol, but the Court held that the injured minor who buys liquor while she is obviously intoxicated may state a cause of action under B & P Code Sec.25602.1. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:41 am
” DeBoer v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
They include the facts that the Decision: (i) relies in substance on a per se prohibition of conditional rebates recognized by the formalistic case-law of the Community courts, notwithstanding that the Commission had clearly indicated in various important policy documents, including its Guidance Paper on Article 82 EC, its intention to move away from this approach for an effects-based analysis; (ii) states, contrary to sound policy, that it need not conduct an “as efficient… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:34 pm
Named for Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
One I totally don't buy, but I can see why someone might adopt that view, and they've got a right to have it heard in court without being spanked.But if the Jensens instead said (as I imagine they probably did) that existing law supported their view, I'd have sanctioned them. [read post]
