Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 5:24 am
Lipidlabs, Inc., 583 F. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:56 pm
Frazier, 455 F.3d at 546 ("This result is supported by the reality that plaintiffs are better positioned than defendants to carry this burden. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
The first list of cy pres largess was objected to by the Electronic Privacy Information Center for an interesting reason as the Register notes: “Amongst the groups that failed to squeeze its snouts into the trough was EPIC, which complained that the selection process favored “organizations that are currently paid by [Defendant] to lobby for or to consult for the company”. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), asking the United States Supreme Court to address the standard for insider trading in a tipper-tippee scenario. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Bogan, 542 F. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:59 am
Amway Corp., supra, 280 F.3d at 528. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:58 am
European Pressphoto Agency, 291 F. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
American Red Cross, 14 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 1993), a case in which the Red Cross used a precedential change confirming that federal courts had jurisdiction over matters involving the Red Cross to re-remove a case that had been improperly remanded earlier. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:34 pm
Summary judgment is therefore DENIED on Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendant Hollis. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:12 am
The NEJM published the study results, with defendants as the lead authors. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:20 am
Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295 (2d Cir. 2013), warrants a different conclusion. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am
According to Kirby’s lawsuit complaint, which shows it was filed on her behalf by the Law Offices of James F. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Wright, 821 F.2d 642, 643 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
Google LLC, 886 F.3d 1179 (Fed. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:05 pm
See Ferreras, 192 F.3d at 11. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
Burke, 605 F. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:59 am
The local rule there, 18.2(f),says "[i]f the out-of-state attorney intends to make an appearance in North Carolina in connection with this matter (such as attending the deposition)," the lawyer must be admitted pro hac. [read post]
CA9: Stop suppressed as based on a hunch and represented at suppression hearing as a mere conclusion
18 May 2012, 4:50 am
Id.; Thomas, 211 F.3d at 1189-92. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:52 am
Aguilar-Tamayo, 300 F.3d at 566. [read post]
