Search for: "Files v. State"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 91,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Facts: This case (Sherwood v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:26 am
Facts: This case (Franco v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:26 am
Facts: This case (GLISSON v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
Facts: This case (PREMIER COMP SOLUTIONS, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:02 am
Facts: This case (United States of America et al v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:55 pm
[Update: the state did not file a PR and the mandate issued on May 3, 2007] [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In Matter of Gutkaiss v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:40 am
Divided Supreme Court of the State of Washington affirms murder conviction of defendant tricked into providing DNA sample by police investigators who were impersonating lawyers: Today's ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 12:18 pm
In Bucks County Community College v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:55 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Based on the new statute, the defense filed a motion toexclude the testimony of two expert witnesses for the plaintiffs, Dr. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:01 am
Finally, here's a link to my post on the Supreme Court's Marshall v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
That should have been the end of this sorry saga, except that now, five months later, Atari has filed a federal lawsuit against State Farm and its ad agencies. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 10:44 am
But around the country, state statutes and local policies prevent prosecutors from accessing these files, much less disclosing the material they contain. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 3:44 pm
So even though the Ninth Circuit expressly invites the state to file for en banc review, it files a brief that says, nah, the state doesn't think it's right and/or worth it to take the case en banc.Now, that doesn't stop the court itself from taking the case en banc if it wants. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
But a decade or so later, he got his sentenced reduced to LWOP on state habeas review because he was intellectually disabled and, under then-recent Supreme Court precedent, we don't execute people like that.So then he files his federal habeas petition, which continues in federal court the challenges to his conviction that he had filed in state court and that the state court rejected. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2014). [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:27 am
The Attorney General’s office has filed an appearance on behalf of the Connecticut Secretary of the State. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]