Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 16,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
Further, the court found that the company’s requests, which encompassed seven years of materials pertaining to the agency’s entire national organization for a wide range of hiring practices and policies, were unduly burdensome (EEOC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Orr v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Thus, in the case of the transposition of federal whistle blower models to universities, the scope of such protection is deceptive for employees of universities who work on a federal grant, subgrant or subcontract, building traps for people who mistakenly believe they "whistleblow" under its protection. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Additional Resources: At this rate, American women won’t get equal pay until 2058, March 16, 2015, By Danielle Paquette, The Washington Post More Blog Entries: Dickson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:40 am
In Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:40 am
In Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
193 Misc.2d 432 751 N.Y.S.2d 351 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
” Gold v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
See order in Texas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 pm
(Brady v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:03 pm
Might I suggest you take a look at Lundeen Coatings, Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:04 pm
This is what happened to the defendant in People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Because if that means something, I suppose it means that after that statutory period of 20 limited years people can use that intellectual property for free. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:23 am
NSA, Hepting v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
