Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M" Results 8561 - 8580 of 33,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 11:29 am by Ted Brooks
Running a quick search shows it’s only about 50 miles between the two, but it’s a different State! [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
But there’s a big problem: 100 of the 323 persons born abroad were extradited, or brought, to the United States for prosecution. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:15 am
"  I don't see Lazarus's basis for drawing confident conclusions about what Thomas's own experience suggests about the benefits of multi-racial learning, and I'm not sure he's characterizing Thomas's views accurately anyway. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:16 am by SCOTUSblog
(Alison Frankel, Reuters)  The Switch in Time That Saved Nine (Steve Vladeck, One First) Cassirer on Remand: Considering the Laws of Other Interested States (Carlos M. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:53 am
Lee Rosenbaum reports that the NY State Board of Regents has released its Proposed Permanent Amendment to its deaccessioning rules. [read post]
However, with respect to the youngest child, the daughter, the court determined it wasn’t in her best interest to follow her stated preference. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:09 am by Gritsforbreakfast
No inmate was responsible for why the state couldn't get them IDs upon release, she said; it was the state's failure causing the barrier.One reason, I'm sure, for legislators' frustration is that DPS was asked while the bill was pending how much it would cost them to implement the program. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The court upheld the conviction, and rejected Marino's free speech argument: The state has broad power to limit a person's liberty interests based on that person's prior conduct. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:17 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
The Secretary of State argued that the Qualification Directive is aimed at protecting against future ill-treatment by the State, or by a third party against which the State cannot or will not provide protection, rather than protecting against the future consequences of previous ill-treatment, and thus did not cover the appellant’s circumstances. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:13 am by Daniel J. Rosenthal
If the answer is none—and I’m at a loss for a solution less invasive than a voluntary request—then it would appear the expectation is that the government should outright ignore the social media presence of individuals seeking to enter the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Actually, I’m likely to post about whatever happens to interest me at any given moment. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 3:59 pm
Then, the issue seemed simply to be whether a better offer existed or not (because, if it did, then accepting the proposed settlement was not in the best interests of the people of the State of Tennessee). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
By way of providing a road map, I’m going to review the case and the judge’s application of the Intel analysis before reaching what I think is the most interesting part of the decision: does § 1782 allow the court to order a person within its jurisdiction to produce evidence, even if the evidence is not located in the United States? [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:53 am
Well, the United States could say that Special 301 isn't intended to enforce WTO rights or obligations, only IP interests more generally, so no violation of Article 23 DSU exists, in any case. [read post]