Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 17,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
A helpful example in this regard is the case of Joseph Arthur Walter Brown v The NDPP and Others in which the former chief executive of Fidentia, who had been charged with numerous counts of fraud and theft, applied for a permanent stay of the prosecution against him on the basis that pre-trial media coverage infringed his right to a fair trial. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
After the City Court denied [his] motion, he pleaded guilty to one count of cyberbullying but reserved his right to raise his constitutional arguments on appeal. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
The counts charged Stratman with violating 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:44 am
One patent lawsuit, Stryker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
National Australia Bank (OT09), United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:44 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
Kevin Elliott received his doctorate in the History and Philosophy of Science (Notre Dame), and he is currently an Associate Professor in Michigan State University. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 pm
In State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:21 am
Last month, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Not so with today’s case, Truitt v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
Judge Arthur ZulickIn his recent decision in the case of Comrie v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
