Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 8561 - 8580 of 21,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2015, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
About two years ago, in Kalikow v Shalik which I wrote about here, Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Vito M. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 9:08 am by Randall Hodgkinson
DavisOut-of-time notice of appeal (Ortiz)State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:05 pm by David Kopel
The exclusion in 2602(B)(v) is for “any article the sale of which is subject to the tax imposed by section 4181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 4181] (determined without regard to any exemptions from such tax provided by section 4182 or 4221 or any other provision of such Code). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am by Nicholas Gebelt
 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy   The Bankruptcy Code (title 11 of the United States Code) is divided up into chapters. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
Meanwhile, a son of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has denied Russian claims that the Erdoğan family has been profiting off of ISIS oil sales. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm by Elina Saxena
Although some now suggest that terrorism has largely shifted to attacks committed by “homegrown, self-radicalized individuals,” the New York Times writes that the President “called for tougher screening of travelers who come to the United States without visas and asked Congress to ban gun sales to people on the government’s no-fly list, and for limits on assault weapons. [read post]
Here, the Court noted, the only commercial activity that took place in the United States was the sale of the Eurorail pass to the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
” That’s how the Maryland Court of Appeals — that state’s highest court — in Bontempo v Lares, 444 Md. 344 [2015], recently referred to the remedy of judicial dissolution made available by statute in most states, including New York, to oppressed minority shareholders of closely held corporations. [read post]