Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8561 - 8580 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2007, 2:00 pm
  Affirming, the court of appeals concluded that Congo had not used the assets "for a commercial activity in the United States" under section 1610(a) of the FSIA despite Congo's explicit waiver of immunity. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by cheynovi
Catalina Vásquez Villalpando: It may seem hard to believe, but the former treasurer of the United States (under the first President Bush) owes $168,000 in back taxes to the city of Washington, DC. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
Ross, involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
After Redd lost his appeal, the California Appellate Project filed a pro forma state habeas petition for him in order to toll the limitations period. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am by Anna Christensen
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 5:51 am by Patricia Salkin
In this case, Southwest Key alleged a violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act; the California Fair Employment and Housing Act; the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Will has an article in the upcoming issue of Newsweek, Cruelty in the Court, discussing the issues at stake in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am by Aaron
The court found that although the provisions of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 4:42 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
Giersch’s inability to visit the United States due to his revoked visa apparently was a factor in the California family court’s decision. [read post]