Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Venard had signed as a condition of his membership with the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association (USHPA). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
See United Steelworkers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm
Late on Tuesday, Apple and Samsung filed a joint stipulation with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California concerning the addition of new products, or new product versions, to the second case pending between these parties in that district. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
First-to-file system: Under the America Invents Act, the United States changes from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system, effective March 16, 2013. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
After amendments to their complaint, the case was removed to the United States Central District of California, which on June 13, 2012 granted summary judgment to those plaintiffs, holding the covenants to be unenforceable under California law and public policy. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
After amendments to their complaint, the case was removed to the United States Central District of California, which on June 13, 2012 granted summary judgment to those plaintiffs, holding the covenants to be unenforceable under California law and public policy. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:21 pm
INA 212 (9)(B)(v) provides for the waiver of the three and ten year bar only for an individual “who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:21 pm
INA 212 (9)(B)(v) provides for the waiver of the three and ten year bar only for an individual “who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
” California is one of the only states where that defense may not fly. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
The degendering of marriage has not been attacked as a violation of the United States constitution because we understand that the marriages the states sanction today are marriage and give what is required by the Constitution (whatever that is, about which the courts have not said much). [read post]
