Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
After an investigation, the USCP’s [USCP=United States Capitol Police]Disciplinary Review Officer proposed that Officer Morris be terminated. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
" Here, then, are the topics being presented by attorneys from the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:12 am
They could also be in different states of the United States, CNRV, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm
Duncan, et al.Previously, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit non-decision tied, 8 to 8, which let stand a U. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
In those, 21 or 41% originated from outside the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:05 am
Upon issuance of the adverse decision in Volvo Trademark the Complainant commenced an ACPA action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In any event, the hearing officer considered that s.5(5) had been impliedly repealed, since the Secretary of State had exercised his powers to provide that a trade mark could be refused registration on relative grounds even where consent had been given, where the proprietor of the earlier trade mark raised an objection in opposition proceedings. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:24 pm
United States, 524 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
” (Internal quotation marks and brackets omitted.) [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
” (Internal quotation marks and brackets omitted.) [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
-Mark M. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
The CJEU ruling is out: Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (Domain Name / Nom de Domaine!) [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:26 am
"[Defendant] states that the United States is an indispensable party to this action. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
United States.] [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:04 pm
Basic information about a patent, such as the filing, issue and priority dates associated with a particular U.S. patent number are available at, for example, the website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
